Plunder Pirates Cannon
This page was last edited on 28 March 2019, at 08:29. Content is available under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Game content and materials are trademarks and copyrights of their respective publisher and its licensors.
Click to expand.How effective is this layout at fighting off attacks and reducing losses suffered in any given attack from both mines/distilleries on the outside as well as from their respective storage buildings in the center? I love the double wall feature, it's something I plane to incorporate, as I upgrade. I ask because I am currently upgrading to PH lvl 6, looking to change my current layout to a one with a more effective defense strategy; and this is one I'm considering.I noticed a couple of things with this particular layout (from a design standpoint) that seems counterintuitive in someways (and logical in others). Would appreciate feedback!. The first thing I noticed, is that all of the gold mines/grog distilleries are all together.
I've 'suffered' heavy losses that way, despite having level 10 cannons in range. The theoretical benefit to this design is that your fire power can be concentrated in just two directions. The downside being, it's all in one spot, making raids of each building fast business. Whereas if you had them spread out amongst other buildings it forces them to potentially deploy their pirates in smaller groups depending on which resource you value the most. (And we know those little guys don't always go where you want them to.) The obvious downside to this is, for example, having 5 cannons, 2 bunkers, 2 mortars, 2 gun towers, and 12 gold mines/grog distilleries all over the place, fire power targeting any one location is going to be reduced.
The second thing I noticed is having the firepower just on the other side of the wall. I get that it's meant to extend the covered area, which is good. The problem with it is attacking pirates can begin to/bring down a cannon, etc. Without bringing down the wall first, leaving the precious resources in the center completely unprotected.
Having a wall followed by another building and THEN a cannon, mortar, etc. Can be quite effective. The seconds it takes them to bring down a wall, and that building on the other side of the wall (just to get to what's still shooting at them, causing a lot of damage), often makes up for the couple of squares you lose in covered turf.
How effective is this layout at fighting off attacks and reducing losses suffered in any given attack from both mines/distilleries on the outside as well as from their respective storage buildings in the center? I love the double wall feature, it's something I plane to incorporate, as I upgrade.
Cities xl trailer platform beds. I ask because I am currently upgrading to PH lvl 6, looking to change my current layout to a one with a more effective defense strategy; and this is one I'm considering.I noticed a couple of things with this particular layout (from a design standpoint) that seems counterintuitive in someways (and logical in others). Would appreciate feedback!. The first thing I noticed, is that all of the gold mines/grog distilleries are all together. I've 'suffered' heavy losses that way, despite having level 10 cannons in range. The theoretical benefit to this design is that your fire power can be concentrated in just two directions.
The downside being, it's all in one spot, making raids of each building fast business. Whereas if you had them spread out amongst other buildings it forces them to potentially deploy their pirates in smaller groups depending on which resource you value the most. (And we know those little guys don't always go where you want them to.) The obvious downside to this is, for example, having 5 cannons, 2 bunkers, 2 mortars, 2 gun towers, and 12 gold mines/grog distilleries all over the place, fire power targeting any one location is going to be reduced. The second thing I noticed is having the firepower just on the other side of the wall.
I get that it's meant to extend the covered area, which is good. The problem with it is attacking pirates can begin to/bring down a cannon, etc. Without bringing down the wall first, leaving the precious resources in the center completely unprotected. Having a wall followed by another building and THEN a cannon, mortar, etc. Can be quite effective. The seconds it takes them to bring down a wall, and that building on the other side of the wall (just to get to what's still shooting at them, causing a lot of damage), often makes up for the couple of squares you lose in covered turf.
Valhalla game. Valhalla Knights 3 is a far cry from being any sort of enjoyable. The setting and class system, while great in theory, are attached to a game that is ugly, grind-heavy, laughably animated,. Valhalla Knights 3 is a disappointment. It has fun moments, but actually enjoying it means wading through a bog of repetition that left me feeling tired and dirty when I reached the other. Valhalla Knights 3 for PlayStation Vita game reviews & Metacritic score: Valhalla Knights 3 is an action RPG with intense real-time battle and seven-on-seven party based combat. Players can create a main character and field-worthy pa. An MMO Without the M or O. Valhalla Knights 3 from XSeed games can best be described as “really wanting to be an MMO.” Don’t be fooled—it’s not an MMO. It is, in fact, a.
How effective is this layout at fighting off attacks and reducing losses suffered in any given attack from both mines/distilleries on the outside as well as from their respective storage buildings in the center? I love the double wall feature, it's something I plane to incorporate, as I upgrade.
I ask because I am currently upgrading to PH lvl 6, looking to change my current layout to a one with a more effective defense strategy; and this is one I'm considering.I noticed a couple of things with this particular layout (from a design standpoint) that seems counterintuitive in someways (and logical in others). Would appreciate feedback!. The first thing I noticed, is that all of the gold mines/grog distilleries are all together. I've 'suffered' heavy losses that way, despite having level 10 cannons in range.
The theoretical benefit to this design is that your fire power can be concentrated in just two directions. The downside being, it's all in one spot, making raids of each building fast business.
Whereas if you had them spread out amongst other buildings it forces them to potentially deploy their pirates in smaller groups depending on which resource you value the most. (And we know those little guys don't always go where you want them to.) The obvious downside to this is, for example, having 5 cannons, 2 bunkers, 2 mortars, 2 gun towers, and 12 gold mines/grog distilleries all over the place, fire power targeting any one location is going to be reduced.
The second thing I noticed is having the firepower just on the other side of the wall. I get that it's meant to extend the covered area, which is good. The problem with it is attacking pirates can begin to/bring down a cannon, etc. Without bringing down the wall first, leaving the precious resources in the center completely unprotected. Having a wall followed by another building and THEN a cannon, mortar, etc.
Can be quite effective. The seconds it takes them to bring down a wall, and that building on the other side of the wall (just to get to what's still shooting at them, causing a lot of damage), often makes up for the couple of squares you lose in covered turf.